[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: including autoconf paths in source
From: |
Jan Engelhardt |
Subject: |
Re: including autoconf paths in source |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:58:10 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.10 (LNX 962 2008-03-14) |
On Saturday 2008-12-20 19:57, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>This is what we've been doing so far. It's not terrible, but it does
>make for a rather long and ugly command line.
While there are no "response" files as there were for DOS
compilers (because of the limited command line length),
you can use:
AM_CFLAGS = -DTHIS -DTHAT `cat file-with-lots-of-options`
for self-cost price.
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, (continued)
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Eric Blake, 2008/12/11
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Jan Engelhardt, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Thomas Dickey, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Thomas Dickey, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Thomas Dickey, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, John Calcote, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Monty Taylor, 2008/12/20
- Re: including autoconf paths in source,
Jan Engelhardt <=
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Eric Blake, 2008/12/20
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Monty Taylor, 2008/12/20