[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>?
From: |
Hallvard B Furuseth |
Subject: |
Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:18:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
I want some code to be semi-independent of Autoconf, and to default
to using <feature> instead of not using it without Autoconf.
#ifdef HAVE_<feature> means that the code will not use <feature>
without autoconf, unless the user defines HAVE_FEATURE by hand.
Are there any conventions for what to call such feature macros and how
to write them in Autoconf? NO_<feature>? NEED_<feature>_REPLACEMENT?
--
Hallvard
- Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>?,
Hallvard B Furuseth <=