Re: Selecting a C++ standard

[Russ Allbery]

Adrian Bunk <address@hidden> writes:

> Real "buildable by C89 or later" is rarely used, since due to lack of 
> long long you have no guaranteed 64bit integer type in C89.

Almost none of the software that I work on requires a 64-bit integer type.
(C89 or later is also my default target for the software I write.)

-- 
Russ Allbery (address@hidden)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>