[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf and Fedora x86_64 /usr/local/lib64?
From: |
Jeffrey Walton |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf and Fedora x86_64 /usr/local/lib64? |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:27:50 -0500 |
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Jeffrey Walton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm having trouble configuring a few Autotool projects on Fedora
> x86_64. Fedora uses /usr/local/lib64 for third party and vendor
> libraries.
>
> GnuTLS requires this sed (from Fedora's patches to gnutls.spec;
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gnutls.git/tree/gnutls.spec;
> thanks NM):
>
> sed -i -e 's|sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib
> /usr/lib|sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib %{_libdir}|g'
> configure
>
> At this point, I believe the hard coded
> "sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec=/lib /usr/lib" is not correct for Fedora
> x86_64, but I don't know what is correct.
>
> My first question is, should sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec should even be
> present? That is, shouldn't the system's config.site or --libdir deal
> with it? Can I delete the line that hard codes
> sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec all together?
>
> My first second is, if its OK to fiddle with
> sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec, then what should the string be? Is /lib
> /usr/lib %{libdir}" correct? Or should it be something else?
I believe this is the controlling bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510073. Or it is the
controlling issue for Fedora. It may apply to Red Hat as well.
I'm less clear on the fix. It seem's like Fedora's
/usr/share/config.site should properly handle --prefix=/usr/local and
libdir, without the need to add a /usr/local/share/site.config or the
need to RTFM. That is, Fedora's site.config should "just work".
Jeff
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Autoconf and Fedora x86_64 /usr/local/lib64?,
Jeffrey Walton <=