automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: subobj8.test: using subdir-objects in a subdirectory


From: Tom Tromey
Subject: Re: subobj8.test: using subdir-objects in a subdirectory
Date: 16 Jul 2001 15:58:05 -0600

>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:

adl> The test case below shows that if the `subdir-objects' options
adl> is used from within a subdirectory (to build files from deeper
adl> directories), then Automake does not require `compile'.

Thanks, I'm checking this in.

Would you like write access to the automake cvs repository?
You'd still have to send patches for review (at least for a while),
but it would mean quicker turnaround for you when (a) someone else can
approve the patch or (b) when the patch is an obvious bug fix.

If you would like it, fill out this form:

    http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi

Put my email address as the approver.

adl> I've played with the following instruction from lanc_c_rewrite:
adl>         &require_file ($FOREIGN, 'compile')
adl>             if $relative_dir eq '.';

Try using require_config_file.  That is probably what we ought to do
in any case.

The require-file code is confused.  It is a prime candidate for
rethink and rewrite.  There is some historical stuff in there (eg we
try to put mdate-sh into the directory with the texinfo sources) which
we could consider changing -- these days we require so many scripts
that pretty much everybody is forced ot use an auxdir anyway.

adl> Note that another related issue, not tested here, is that
adl> AM_PROG_CC_C_O is not AUX_DIR-aware: it relies on `compile'
adl> beeing installed as `$top_srcdir/compile' :(

Yeah, thanks.

Tom



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]