[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304 |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:20:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
Tom> I'm checking this in. This fixes PR 304.
Tom> After we fix a few of the more critical bugs we should probably
Tom> release 1.6.1.
Two issues:
- Right now, &version_check doesn't appear to support two-dot
versions: it will only grok 1.6-p1.
- Richard's fix for &check_typo, allowing AC_SUBST's variables
with reserved suffixes is quite important, but it's also an
API breakage: if this went in 1.6.1, it would mean that a
Makefile.am which works with 1.6.1 might not work with 1.6
(although these two versions would be advertised as sharing
the same API).
Tom> I think this bug qualifies as being important enough to
Tom> warrant a bug-fix release.
Agreed. What about naming it 1.7?
[...]
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/17
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/24
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/24
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/25
- 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Tom Tromey, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Tom Tromey, 2002/03/26
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/26