[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304 |
Date: |
24 Mar 2002 13:33:07 -0700 |
>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
adl> - Richard's fix for &check_typo, allowing AC_SUBST's variables
adl> with reserved suffixes is quite important, but it's also an API
adl> breakage: if this went in 1.6.1, it would mean that a
adl> Makefile.am which works with 1.6.1 might not work with 1.6
adl> (although these two versions would be advertised as sharing the
adl> same API).
That's a difficult point, isn't it? :-(
When is an API breakage different from a simple bug?
For instance, if you use the aclocal from 1.6 you'll get a broken
Makefile. How does that differ?
adl> Agreed. What about naming it 1.7?
I'd rather not, but perhaps it is simplest to do that.
Tom
- Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/17
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/20
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/24
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/25
- 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Tom Tromey, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Tom Tromey, 2002/03/26
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/26
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/26