[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304)
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304) |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:50:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
adl> I don't understand all the issues involved in depcomp. For
adl> instance, why does it computes dependencies in the background?
Tom> Performance. It's probably the case that it is faster to run the two
Tom> compilations in parallel than to run them sequentially.
Tom> This might be a mistake; we might find strange bugs doing this.
It looks like PR 307 is one of them.
[...]
adl> extra6 - fails on Tru64 too, see the discussion with Nicolas
adl> Joly on bug-automake.
Tom> This is the CONFIG_SITE thing, right? Let's just check in your
Tom> proposed change (either of them).
No. The ansi5.test failure was about site configuration, but
it's fixed in CVS (with ./configure --quiet).
extra6.test is a different issue where Tru64 Make magically
create empty directories in the build tree. It can be fixed by
teaching distdir how to merge directories from . and $(srcdir).
I've sent a patch for this. Actually, this is a new feature
which fixes extra6.test as a side-effect.
Tom> I don't think we need to worry about all the cases that
Tom> autoconf does.
I don't understand what you are referring to.
adl> pr87 - a distcheck issue I've not investigated
Tom> This is closed. I thought there was another problem referring to it,
Tom> but I couldn't find it.
Sorry, this list is all about _testcases_ which fails on Solaris.
pr87.test does fail, but this is probably unrelated to PR/87.
adl> ccnoco - PR/310
adl> pr224 - PR/310
adl> subobj6 - PR/310
adl> yacc8 - PR/310
adl> yaccvpath - I've not looked at it. Another VPATH horror, I
adl> guess.
adl> None of them would fail when using GNU make (with CVS Automake).
Tom> If we can support VPATH for SunOS (I usually write "Solaris", since
Tom> "SunOS" forever means SunOS 3.x/4.x to me), then that would be nice.
Tom> However, I don't think this is a 1.6.1 issue. For now we could just
Tom> require GNU make in these tests.
Fixing PR/310 will takes as much time as adding
$require_gnu_make to these tests :)
Tom> I suspect we'll have trouble making VPATH work reliably. Maybe we
Tom> could have some assertion that says "I want VPATH to work on Solaris,
Tom> warn me if I somehow break it".
-Wsolaris-vpath-issues :)
Tom> Then we could disable features (e.g., nobase_) which are
Tom> not easy or possible to make work in that scenario.
Tom> That's a lot to do. It's easier to just prohibit this. Still, if
Tom> someone feels like doing the work, I'm for it.
adl> subdir5 - XPASS. I've not looked at this one
Tom> Hari fixed this, though the patch isn't in yet.
When I awaken this morning I wondered why Hari's patch would fix
this subdir5.test failure. (Yep, I've finally bought the new
ePillow.) This is somethign that happens with Solaris make but
not with GNU make [1], how can it be related to AUTOHEADER and
AUTOCONF?
[1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-automake/2002/msg00209.html
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, (continued)
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/20
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/24
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/24
- Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304, Tom Tromey, 2002/03/25
- 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Tom Tromey, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/25
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Tom Tromey, 2002/03/26
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304),
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/26
- Re: 1.6.1 todo (was: Re: Patch: FYI: PR 304), Raja R Harinath, 2002/03/26