[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: depout.m4 adjustment for post-processed Makefile.ins
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: depout.m4 adjustment for post-processed Makefile.ins |
Date: |
26 Apr 2002 11:24:15 -0600 |
>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
adl> - Debian Bug#144221: dejagnu.am build site.exp and site.bak, and never
adl> erase these files. Hence `make distcheck' always fails.
I wrote a patch. I don't have a test case though.
What do you think? I was undecided whether I should start using the
new naming scheme ("am--distclean-dejagnu") or whether to keep using
the old scheme and just plan a big rename in the future.
Tom
Index: ChangeLog
from Tom Tromey <address@hidden>
* lib/am/dejagnu.am (distclean-DEJAGNU): New target.
Index: lib/am/dejagnu.am
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/lib/am/dejagnu.am,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 dejagnu.am
--- lib/am/dejagnu.am 2 Oct 2001 16:00:03 -0000 1.16
+++ lib/am/dejagnu.am 26 Apr 2002 17:16:27 -0000
@@ -94,3 +94,15 @@
@-rm -f site.bak
@test ! -f site.exp || mv site.exp site.bak
@mv site.tmp site.exp
+
+## ---------- ##
+## Cleaning. ##
+## ---------- ##
+
+.PHONY distclean-am: distclean-DEJAGNU
+
+distclean-DEJAGNU:
+## Any other cleaning must be done by the user or by the test suite
+## itself. We can't predict what dejagnu or the test suite might
+## generate.
+ -rm -f site.exp site.bak