[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2)
From: |
Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:24:32 +0200 |
> I *need* it to make sure I install all the files. Installcheck makes
> sure that the program, once installed, behaves properly. `check' per
> se is ridiculous: who cares to know that the program works in the
> build tree? (of course you want that before installing, but that's
> not the point).
You're right, when I started working under Unix I was bit by this quite a
few times. But I think that it is of dubious utility to have installcheck
run the same developer-oriented regression tests or autotest test cases that
are run in `make check', a different suite (INSTALLTESTS?) would be needed.
>From the point of view of a developer making changes that can break things
in trivial ways (trivial enough to show up in the build tree, I mean), or
that need expected failures to remember something needs to be fixed
urgently, `make check' is not ridiculous at all.
Paolo
- patch 4: test for --help and --version, Bonzini, 2002/06/12
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/06/13
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2), Bonzini, 2002/06/13
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2), Akim Demaille, 2002/06/13
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2),
Bonzini <=
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2), Akim Demaille, 2002/06/13
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2), Bonzini, 2002/06/13
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 2), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/06/13
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 3), Paolo Bonzini, 2002/06/17
- Re: patch 4: test for --help and --version (take 3), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/06/17