[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fri, 19 May 2006 14:33:51 -0700
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
That looks good to me, except let's not remove this comment:
> -# The usefulness of this macro is questionable, as I can't really see
> -# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
> -# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
> I actually don't know whether there exists a losing
> Fortran compiler outside of the Cray-Cyber museum, but if Automake
> is going to use the macros, it's IMHO not suitable to suggest that
> Autoconf could remove them.
Welllll, strictly speaking, the comment doesn't suggest that Autoconf
could remove the macro. Autoconf could turn it into a
backward-compatibility no-op, for example.
- AC_PROG_CXX_C_O, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/19
- Re: AC_PROG_CXX_C_O,
Paul Eggert <=