Re: Documentation for the parallel-tests driver. [4/4]

[Jim Meyering]

Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> I decided that this was more than I could implement in the time that I
> had for this, and it is probably more than I will have time for in the
> near future.  Alternatively, is there a volunteer for implementing it?
>
> I'm currently trying to gauge whether the question is:
>
> - drop my 'parallel-tests' patches now, try for or wait for something
>   better?  or
> - add my 'parallel-tests' bits now, and go on?
>
> Adding the patch set now would likely mean some incompatibility in the
> future when your proposed semantics are implemented, which would be bad.
>
> Comments appreciated.  And please don't get me wrong, I'm not attached
> to this patch set, but I do want to provide parallel tests eventually.

As they say, ...

    A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.

and this is a big bird.