Re: [PATCH 11] Fix LAZY_TEST_SUITE handling and $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) recreation.

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hello Akim,

addressing part of your reply:

* Akim Demaille wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:00:42PM CET:
> Le 14 mars 09 à 14:46, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>> * Akim Demaille wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 02:25:03PM CET:
>>> FWIW, I also noticed that we sometimes had tests that were removed/
>>> renamed that were still marked as XFAILs.  So I use this in some of  
>>> my test suites:
>>
>> Why are these not simply treated as hard failures?
>
> Hum, I don't understand what you mean here, they are.  My code checks  
> that members of XFAIL_TESTS and TFAIL_TESTS exist, and reports the  
> missing ones.

Never mind.  I misunderstood your prior message completely.

Your rule can be simplified a lot:  :-)

# Check that XFAIL tests do exist.
check-test-list-XFAIL: $(XFAIL_TESTS)
check-test-list-TFAIL: $(TFAIL_TESTS)
.PHONY: check-test-list-XFAIL check-test-list-TFAIL

Of course that will also update the actual tests if they are generated
themselves, but IIUC then that should not be a problem for you.

You could even
check-local: check-test-list-XFAIL check-test-list-TFAIL

Cheers,
Ralf