Re: [PATCH] Make badopt.test stricter (by enabling `set -e').

[Stefano Lattarini]

At Sunday 25 April 2010, Stefano Lattarini 
<address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that would be better, because it would lower the per-patch
> >  effort. Thanks.
> 
> OK, I'll use bigger lumps when it makes sense.
> 
That said, I think this patch should be applied as-is, since it fixes a 
potential false negative in the tests.  The other patches I'm planning 
to lump togheter are mostly consistency-related (they ought to make 
the use of the `errexit' shell flag in test script more consistent), 
but should not imply any semantic change/improvement.

Thanks,
    Stefano