[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comment on introduction pages
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: Comment on introduction pages |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jun 2010 02:43:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; ) |
Hello automakers.
For a better understanding of this answer, please refer to the thread
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2010-06/msg00004.html>
on the bug-autoconf mailing list. Thanks.
At Friday 04 June 2010, Christina Gratorp
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a suggestion that would make a difference when visiting your
> otherwise eminent website:
> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Introduction. The
> sentence "The developer expresses the recipe to build *his*
> package in a Makefile" must be wrong since I'm a woman and a user
> and have packages I want to build and those packages are mine, i.e
> *hers* would be correct in this case. (I know that his could be
> considered neutral but really, it doesn't feel that way.)
>
> Suggestion: change the sentence to "The developer expresses the
> recipe to build *his/hers* package in a Makefile"
FWIW: this seem unnecessary convoluted to me, but it's not a big deal
after all (even if it makes me cringe, sorta); on the other hand...
> or "The developer expresses the recipe to build *the* package in a
> Makefile"
... changing to "the" loses the notion of ownership; and as there is
more than one package with mention in the sentence (which package: the
developer's, or Automake?), I feel that losing the possessive pronoun
would be a step backwards -- and using "the developer's" feels
redundant.
[quoted from observations by Eric Blake, with whom I agree]
> or "The developer expresses the recipe to build *their* package
> in a Makefile"
.. and please, *please*, at least don't use this last formulation,
as it might be really confusing (and might seem downright uncorrect,
even if technically it's not) for non-native speakers not accustomed
with this kind of gender-neutral pronouns (e.g., me).
To summarize: I wouldn't change the formulation *at all*, but if you
are willing to change it anyway, please choose the (inelegant but
clearer) form "his/hers".
Regards,
Stefano