automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool and Cuda


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: libtool and Cuda
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:08:24 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22)

[ adding automake-patches, replies can drop libtool@ ]

* Adam Mercer wrote on Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:03:53PM CEST:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 13:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

[ automake support for cuda ]

> > I'd love to have this, and there has been a patch for this, too
> > (and I think it was reasonably good), but again, the copyright
> > question could not be cleared up so we have to ignore the patch.
> >
> > If you are willing to code up a patch for this, and to assign
> > copyright to the FSF, then be my guest.
> 
> I'll take a look but can't promise anything. I have no objection with
> assigning copyright to the FSF as this will make things much easier in
> the future.
> 
> Where would be an appropriate place to start in looking at adding this 
> support?

Check out the Automake git tree, find the patch in the git log that
added UPC support.  Or the discussion on the automake-patches list.
It's probably almost as simple as s/UPC/CUDA/ s/upc/cuda/  plus
adjusting some blurbs and the actual compile rule, once you know how it
should look like.

Cheers,
Ralf



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]