[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master) |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:05:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
[Reposting with a better subject. Sorry for the noise.]
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Stefano,
>
> I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
> the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
> stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
> that a testsuite run shows on a few hosts; you can find them in some
> minutes on <http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/>.
Log:
<http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-201011141903417895000.txt>
Minimal system info:
configure: autobuild project... GNU Automake
configure: autobuild revision... v1.11-225-gcdd3cf3
configure: autobuild hostname... hikaru
configure: autobuild mode... default
configure: autobuild timestamp... 20111412T185841Z
checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10
-*-*-*-
All the testsuite failures seem spurious, and due to the following
rm error (in the "distclean" target, if I'm not mistaken):
"rm: Unable to remove directory ...: File exists"
What's going on here?
Maybe NFS issues (wild guess)?
<http://www.unix.com/unix-dummies-questions-answers/72080-rm-unable-remove-directory-mnt-users-test-logs-file-exists.html>
Or something relate to FS logging or FS corruption (wilder guess)?
<http://www.webservertalk.com/archive101-2004-1-65261.html>
-*-*-*-
I can say I test automake on a Solaris 10 system (i86pc) quite often,
and the testsuite is behaving quite well there (apart from some
pre-existing, mostly spurious failures).
Regards,
Stefano
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, (continued)
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/15
- backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands. (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/16
- Shell comments in make rules (was: backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules (was: backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
Spurious failures of some silent*.test tests when cc != gcc (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/17
Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master),
Stefano Lattarini <=
Re: testsuite results from master, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/14
Testsuite failures on HP-UX 11.23 (was: Re: testsuite results from master), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/14
Testsuite results on FreeBSD 6.4 on i386 (was: testsuite results from master), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/14
Testsuite failures on IRIX 6.5 (was: testsuite results from master), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/14