Re: Merging 'yacc-work' into master

[Stefano Lattarini]

On 02/13/2012 04:28 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> * NEWS: Make it clear that it's the derived C code that has
>> to be non-distributed for it to be removed by "make clean",
>> not the Yacc/Lex source.  Also fix some grammaros and typos.
> 
> I apparently got that backwards.  I deluded myself by thinking
> that noone in their right mind would *not* distribute the Yacc/Lex
> source.
>
Which is probably true.  But since we nonetheless allow such a setup,
we should strive to provide a (mostly) sane and behaviour for it.

> Ah well, sorry for the noise (but some of the typos
> could still be picked out of that patch I suppose).
>
Yes.  Will you do that, or should I?  If you do, the resulting patch
is pre-approved of course.

Thanks,
  Stefano