[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name.
|
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
|
Subject: |
Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. |
|
Date: |
07 Feb 2001 01:16:45 -0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
On Feb 6, 2001, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
> Don't go that way! AC_PREREQ.
It won't let you define fallbacks for older releases, which is exactly
the point. ifdef, as you proposed, is the way to go.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/05
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/05
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/05
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/06
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name.,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/07
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/07
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/07
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Tom Tromey, 2001/02/05