[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name.
|
From: |
Tom Tromey |
|
Subject: |
Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name. |
|
Date: |
07 Feb 2001 22:47:05 -0700 |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
Pavel> I believe that names beginning with am_ are
Pavel> private. I.e. AM_INCLUDE should become am_include. I believe
Pavel> that user code should not do anything with the names beginning
Pavel> with ac_ and am_.
I chose `_am_' instead to make it even more obvious.
Tom
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., (continued)
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/05
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/05
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/06
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/06
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/07
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/07
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Akim Demaille, 2001/02/07
- Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name., Tom Tromey, 2001/02/05