[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 36-uniq.patch
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: 36-uniq.patch |
|
Date: |
21 Feb 2001 09:28:20 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Akim> It is on purpose my uses of uniq have no &: it disables
> Akim> prototype checking.
>
> Do we really want prototypes? I seem to remember Perl experts telling
> me that they are confusing and weird.
You tell me! There is nothing in HACKING :)
I am not aware of the problems. I know they forbid things, but then
using & again fixes the issue (i.e., I'm not aware of problems which
require removing the prototype, adjusting the call is enough).