Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch

[Pavel Roskin]

Hello, Allan!

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Allan Clark wrote:

> Akim, everyone;

I'm rather everyone than Akim, but anyway :-)

> Is there I way I can simply get the discussion, without the binary/patch
> traffic?  I would prefer to receive this kind of thing through an update
> from a source-control (ie CVS) than copies from email.

It is mostly proposed patches and they are posted here for discussion. But
I agree that it may be better to have a separate list.

> Should I sign up on a different list?  Should address@hidden
> be formed?

It should be address@hidden for consistency with Autoconf. By
the way, it's not binaries, it's Perl code. Sometimes they look
confusingly similar :-)

Regards,
Pavel Roskin