[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: make dist and BUILT_SOURCES

From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: make dist and BUILT_SOURCES
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 08:34:38 +1000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Tromey" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: make dist and BUILT_SOURCES

> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> >> Were they also listed in another foo_SOURCES variable?
> >> That would cause them to end up in the dist.
> Robert> Yes they were. I didn't know you could do
> Robert> BUILT_foo_SOURCES. I'll try rearranging the targets like that
> Robert> and get back to you..
> You can't do BUILT_foo_SOURCES.  We must have miscommunicated.  I
> don't think I said that.  Anyway I didn't mean to.
> Tom

Ok, I think I know where my confusion came from:

bin_PROGRAMS = foo
foo_SOURCES  = foo.c bar.c

## if bar.c is built I must have

bar.c : abc

You asked if bar.c was also in the foo_SOURCES line for a program ->
from that I guestimated that BUILT_foo_SOURCES would let me associate
bar.c with foo, and not distribute it. Then in a different email I got
introduced to nodist_foo_SOURCES... which is the actual change (from
_SOURCES to nodist_*_SOURCES) I needed to make.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]