[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem: multiple definitions
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: problem: multiple definitions |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:37:07 +1000 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Akim Demaille" <address@hidden>
To: "Robert Collins" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: problem: multiple definitions
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden>
writes:
>
> Robert> 2) snmplib/Makefile.am:14: DEFS multiply defined in condition
> Robert> TRUE DEFS (User, where = 14) = {
> >>
> Robert> TRUE => -DSQUID_SNMP=1 }
>
> >> Hm... I'll look into this one. The idea is that somehow we must
> >> be able to tell Automake `look, this is an Automake variable, but
> >> the user is allowed to override it'. Currently it's probably too
> >> strict.
>
> Robert> Any extra details needed - let me know.
>
> I think that what I said does not apply, and does match with the
> actual error you face. Could you grep for DEFS in your Makefile.am?
> Thanks!
>
This has gone away with current CVS.
the makefile.am has
$ grep DEFS snmplib/Makefile.am
DEFS = -DSQUID_SNMP=1
Rob
- problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Robert Collins, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Robert Collins, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Robert Collins, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: multiple definitions, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: multiple definitions, Jens Krüger, 2001/04/12
- Re: problem: multiple definitions, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/12
- Re: problem: multiple definitions,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/17
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/17
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/17
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Robert Collins, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Robert Collins, 2001/04/18