[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pr19.test
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: pr19.test |
Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2001 22:08:33 +1000 |
I went to retest this : I couldn't find pr19.test. pr9, yes, pr19, no.
Is it still in HEAD?
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Tromey" <address@hidden>
To: "Robert Collins" <address@hidden>
Cc: "edward" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: pr19.test
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden>
writes:
>
> Robert> I recall it failing on openBSD 2.8.
>
> Cool.
>
> Now, how can we fix it?
>
> One idea would be to emit `.PRECIOUS: parse.c'. However, I don't know
> if that will work with a non-GNU make. Would that work on OpenBSD?
> (I don't have access to an OpenBSD machine to test it.)
>
> Another idea would be to emit explicit `parse.c: parse.y' rules for
> every such file. Would we have to emit the entire rule, or is just
> the dependency enough? I forget. If we can just emit the dependency
> then this is probably the best fix.
>
> Tom
>