[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake release
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: Automake release |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2001 13:13:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:20:32AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Allan" == Allan Clark <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Allan> So whatever happened to numeric point releases?
> Allan> "1.5 will do that"
> Allan> "this is release 1.4.3, automake-1.4.3"
>
> In gnits there are only two numbers. The third one, if it exists,
> indicates an alpha release. That is the problem.
Looks like time for the Linux (and now more widely used) scheme
of "odd releases are development; even releases are stable".
Of course, to abide by the broken gnits rule you refer to, it'll
have to the be the major release number whose evenness matters:
1.x is development; 2.x stable.
(That the gnits two-number rule is "broken" is only my opinion,
of course, but that opinion was formed directly as a result of
this thread :-)
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
- Re: Automake release, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Automake release, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/05/10
- Re: Automake release, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/20
- Re: Automake release, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/05/20
- Re: Automake release, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/20
- Re: Automake release, Allan Clark, 2001/05/20
- Re: Automake release, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/20
- Re: Automake release, Bob Proulx, 2001/05/20
- Re: Automake release,
Eric Siegerman <=