automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Libtool's manual disparages Automake! :-o


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: Libtool's manual disparages Automake! :-o
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:11:38 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am auditing the libtool texinfo manual in preparation for the next release.

Currently, it says:

~   The flags `-dlopen' or `-dlpreopen' (*note Link mode::) would fit
better in the PROGRAM_LDADD variable.  Unfortunately, GNU automake, up
to release 1.4, doesn't accept these flags in a PROGRAM_LDADD variable,
so you have the following alternatives:

~   * add them to PROGRAM_LDFLAGS, and list the libraries in
~     PROGRAM_DEPENDENCIES, then wait for a release of GNU automake that
~     accepts these flags where they belong;

~   * surround the flags between quotes, but then you must set
~     PROGRAM_DEPENDENCIES too:

~          program_LDADD = "-dlopen" libfoo.la
~          program_DEPENDENCIES = libfoo.la

~   * set and `AC_SUBST' variables DLOPEN and DLPREOPEN in
~     `configure.in' and use address@hidden@' and address@hidden@' as
~     replacements for the explicit flags `-dlopen' and `-dlpreopen' in
~     `program_LDADD'.  Automake will discard `AC_SUBST'ed variables
~     from dependencies, so it will behave exactly as we expect it to
~     behave when it accepts these flags in `program_LDADD'.  But hey!,
~     this is ugly!

I am unsure of the wisdom of these words.  Should I change the manual to
wholeheartedly recommend the first alternative, and discard the others?  Or
should Automake be patched to accept `program_LDADD = -dlopen foo.la'?

Cheers,
        Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAO5PaFRMICSmD1gYRAjNNAKC6kRa8TRE+Fe4JRy0CUtMH3IbPjwCfYDaI
48Iddk/Izgc2UgvPfu27HIQ=
=Kwq3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]