[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compile problem
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: compile problem |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:53:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615) |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>>>>"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <address@hidden> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Gary> So does that simply mean that libtool objects can be correctly built
> Gary> as subdir-objects without AM_PROG_CC_C_O? Sorry to bug you, just
> Gary> making sure I understand why you made the patch the way you did...
>
> The purpose of AM_PROG_CC_C_O is to replace CC by the `compile'
> script which emulates a compiler that supports `-c -o' when the
> real CC does not. As you pointed out, libtool already supplies such
> emulation, so `compile' is never needed when compiling lo files.
Okay. But for a project built with `make -j', we still need AM_PROG_CC_C_O
and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-(
> [...]
>
> Gary> Meant to ask, why doesn't AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (conditionally if
> Gary> necessary) simply invoke AM_PROG_CC_C_O?
>
> We know it's needed only after processing the Makefile.am files.
Why not invoke it anyway?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/07
- Re: compile problem, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/07
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/08
- Re: compile problem,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: compile problem, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/20
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/21
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/20
- Re: compile problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/09/20
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/21
Re: compile problem, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/08