[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: back to directory dependencies

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: back to directory dependencies
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:53:58 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:14:03AM CEST:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>But I have another problem with SUBDIRS. As I mentioned in the previous
> >>thread, specifying -j starts building of l1 and src1 in parallel. l1
> >>lasts longer, and src1 fails due to missing l1. So I think I really need
> >>dependencies rather than sequence. What do you think?
> >
> >Which `make' does that?  I can't seem to get GNU make to do so.
> >(If it's GNU make, the quick'n'dirty solution would be to add
> >to the toplevel  But that helps only for GNU make.)
> Note that he said `-j', not `-j 2', or `-j 8'.  Without an argument -j 
> is something close to infinite parallelism so it should indeed start 
> considering the next directory as well. 

ECANNOTREPRODUCE.  Which GNU make version? 
Over here GNU make-3.80 does _not_ parallelize across SUBDIRs.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]