[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shared libtool noinst_ or check_ libraries?
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: shared libtool noinst_ or check_ libraries? |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:45:26 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de> writes:
> FWIW, there's no documentation reachable from that URL, so it's not
> really easy to understand what this tool intends to achieve.
Yes, I'll fix that soon. I just started this...
[..]
> if you need a shared library, you
> could just add that argument manually, e.g., by
> libtest_foo_la_LDFLAGS = -rpath /foo $(AM_LDFLAGS)
I understand. This works as a charm! It would be nice if libtool
were to give a warning, but that would be a libtool feature request.
> > AM_DISABLE_STATIC
> > AC_DISABLE_STATIC
>
> These two are synonyms, using just the latter is sufficient.
Ok, thanks!
Greetings,
Jan.