[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_LIBADD
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AM_LIBADD |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:44:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general/7761>
Hello Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:54:56AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hello Akim,
>
> Hi Ralk, I missed your answer :)
Hehe, interesting typo. Ralph is a more common one. ;-)
> Never thought about LIBS...
>
> But anyway it is inconsistent:
>
> - it does not obey the FOO/AM_FOO rule of ownership of the macros
> (those from the user, and those from the developer)
>
> - it does not spell like libfoo_la_LIBADD.
>
> And anyway, I guess LIBS applies to programs in addition to libraries,
> while LIBADD is meant for libraries only.
Sure. I think the addition of AM_LIBADD/tgt_LIBADD and
AM_LDADD/tgt_LDADD is a good idea.
Want to propose a patch? Or rather wait until I have more time for
Automake again? Maybe you have a way to ping Alexandre...
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: AM_LIBADD, Akim Demaille, 2007/02/08
- Re: AM_LIBADD,
Ralf Wildenhues <=