[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: AM_LIBS / AM_LDADD
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:42:28 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-04)

Hello BenoƮt,

* NightStrike wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:29:05PM CET:
> On 11/6/07, Benoit SIGOURE <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > would anyone be against the introduction of AM_LIBS / AM_LDADD
> > (before the release of 1.11) to be more consistent with the existing
> > AM_*flags?

For consistency, AM_LIBADD should be added as well.  And the new
variables should probably have semantics comparable to LIBS, LDADD,
and *_LIBADD, respectively.

> Can you add to that also AM_DLLTOOLFLAGS?

It's been mentioned before: Automake currently does not use dlltool.
What would AM_DLLTOOLFLAGS be for then?  Support for it would be a null
change.  Just put $(AM_DLLTOOLFLAGS) into your self-written rules that
use dlltool, and there you have it: support for AM_DLLTOOLFLAGS!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]