[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Make Extensions
From: |
NightStrike |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Make Extensions |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:08:25 -0500 |
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't the onus be on me, as the project maintainer, to accept that
>> risk and craft the wildcards properly? I for one would wager heavily
>> that the probability of that being a problem is FAR less than the
>> current problems of maintaining the source file list. Doing it
>> manually has already proven so error-prone as to cause significant
>> lost time.
>
> The problem is not so much the crafting of wildcards as it is unintended
> "accidents" in the filesystem. For my own project I do have some bits which
> are based on wildcards and several times files have been bundled up which I
> did not intend to be included.
Ok, so again, I should be allowed to accept that *potential* risk as
being far less than the current situation of *actual* risk which is
causing problems. If I knew anything about Perl, I'd just do it
myself, but alas, the automake source confounds me :(
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, (continued)
Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/10
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/10
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/10
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/10
- Re: GNU Make Extensions,
NightStrike <=
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/10
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Russell Shaw, 2008/12/10
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Duft Markus, 2008/12/11
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Duft Markus, 2008/12/11
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/11
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/12
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/12
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/16
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/16
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Duft Markus, 2008/12/16