|
From: | Lorenzo Bettini |
Subject: | Re: invoke pkg-config with --static |
Date: | Fri, 22 May 2009 15:48:49 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:01:18PM CEST:Ralf Wildenhues wrote:No, I meant: not using Libs.private at all is however a safe choice, isn't it?* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:27:32PM CEST:Ralf Wildenhues wrote:mhhh... so basically this means that it is better not to use Libs.private in the pkg-config file,You can just use pkg-config --static all the time, unless ( disable_static && ( host_os == Linux || host_os == Solaris ) ) Works wonders! :-)No, that is not what I said. Doing that will continue to do the wrong thing even when Libtool is fixed one day.No, it isn't. At least that's how I understand it. Why would you think so? Only on GNU/Linux and Solaris it might be safe, and only if you don't care about static linkage.
No I meant: if additional libraries are shown when building with shared library enable, this should do no harm, shouldn't it?
In such case, one could simply not use .Private specification in .pc file. -- Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233) HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |