Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter

[Stefano Lattarini]

On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:00:05PM CET:
> > ... I'm fine with this; I'll just rewrite the fixme comment to
> > reference the thread above and to be more "possibilist":
> > 
> >  @c FIXME: Could we find a better name than $(AM_V_at)?  $(AM_V_SILENT)
> >  @c is nice, but also a bit too long.
> >  @c If we find such a better name, we should then deprecate $(AM_V_at),
> >  @c but *not* remove it: it should be kept for backward-compatibility.
> 
> Instead, please open a PR by writing to bug-automake, and point to the
> cited threads and this one.  debbugs is better than a comment in the
> manual.
> 
You're right of course.  PR opened.

Regards,
   Stefano