[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rarely rebuilt files
From: |
fr33domlover |
Subject: |
Re: Rarely rebuilt files |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:02:06 +0200 |
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> >> When the files are distributed, the "distcheck" should recognize that
> >> these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
>
> > Hmmm I think I didn't make myself clear. So just to make sure, before I
> > cause confusion: The files are indeed distributed validaly. The "problem"
> > is that they are not cleaned by `make distclean`. I intentionally made them
> > clean only on `make maintainer-clean`. When `make distcheck` sees they
> > don't get cleaned by `make distclean`, it produces an error.
>
> If they are distributed, the distcheck target should not complain,
> because it should expect the files to be there.
>
> Can you post the relevant parts of the Makefile.am ?
>
> Simon
The files are not specified in any variable with 'dist_' prefix. They are
distributed because I wrote a dist-hook. Normally I would also add them to
DISTCLEANFILES, but in this case I decided I prefer MAINTAINERCLEANFILES, which
is why `make distclean` doesn't remove them and the error is generated by `make
distcheck`.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Rarely rebuilt files, fr33domlover, 2014/11/11
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, Simon Richter, 2014/11/11
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, fr33domlover, 2014/11/11
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, Nick Bowler, 2014/11/12
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, fr33domlover, 2014/11/12
- Message not available
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, Nick Bowler, 2014/11/12
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, fr33domlover, 2014/11/12
- Re: Rarely rebuilt files, fr33domlover, 2014/11/13
Message not available