[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is th
From: |
Vincent Trouilliez |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question ! |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:48:17 +0100 |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:13:00 +0100 (MET)
address@hidden (Joerg Wunsch) wrote:
> Careful: that's /not/ called ATmega1284 but ATmega1284P. You should
> have learned now that these letters might make a difference...
Oops sorry, yes I meant 'P ;-)
> Curious, why are you limited to DIP packages? I find them
> unpractically large.
That's why :
http://freudhoefer.de/File_Share/Vince/PICT0002.JPG
It's a hobby/amateur project, so I use a prototype board to develop the
hardware, so I am limited to through-hole technology, meaning DIP
packages for everything. I don't have the soldering equipment for
surface mount components, and with my big fat fingers I probably
wouldn't be succesful with it anyhow ! ;-/
DIP packages also give me headaches, as I need a large (8 or 16 Mbits
serial data Flash memory), operatiung at 5 volts, and nothing is
available ! Grr...
> I haven't seen an ATmega1284P in DIP yet at all,
Well Atmel lists them and Digikey sells them in tubes of 290 pieces, so
they are there !
> [..] but it's possible they aren't in full production yet.
Yeah, I hope production will rise so one can find them at Farnell or
RS, and preferably not in tubes of 290 pieces...
--
Vince
- [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/04
- RE: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/04
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/05
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/05
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !,
Vincent Trouilliez <=
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, David Kelly, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Uwe Bonnes, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Uwe Bonnes, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Robert L Cochran, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/06