Re: [avr-gcc-list] A Suggestion to the avr-gcc-list Manager

[Chris Baugher]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> Chris Baugher <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> >> I simple way around the problem you seem to be having is to select
> >> ReplyAll rather than just Reply.
> 
> > This doesn't address what to do if you want to reply the list ONLY.
> 
> Well, there are various options for this:
> 
> .. you manually edit the headers after hitting the group-reply button,

doing that now

> .. you use an MUA that supports replying to mailing lists (e. g. Mutt
>   does -- and Mutt's default behaviour is much like pine, so you
>   shouldn't have much troubles using it),

This won't happen. I've been been using Pine for a long time and would be
sad if I had to switch.:(

> .. procmail has already been mentioned,

hmmm... yes...

> .. i use a mail -> news gateway that sets the reply-to address
>   accordingly (and adds a "followup-to: poster" so nobody would
>   followup into the local newsgroup).
> 
> In either case, i agree with Jason that this should not be done at the
> mailing list gateway.  Many other mailing lists have been discussing
> this before, and virtually all agree that it's a bad idea.

Wow. I must have been lucky then. I'm pretty sure all 6 of the other lists
I'm on DO mung the headers.

C|

> 
> -- 
> J"org Wunsch                                         Unix support engineer
> address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://avr.jpk.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>