Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?

[Tvrtko A. Ursulin]

On Wednesday 16 October 2002 16:07, Kang Tin LAI wrote:

> As my understanding, you are the fourth one for this question of "naked"
> attribute. Everyone playing avr-gcc with kernel have to face this
> problem.
>
> If this is a "address" operation in your function, it is also a trouble
> regardless how many local you using.

I don't quite understand this bit?

> If you are using linux, I may send you my patch for "naked" which
> generates a proper stack frame setup. But you need to have your source
> codes of gcc, binutils and compilation system working for recompiling
> the avr-gcc.

Yes plese, I have already compiled eveything myself so that won't be a 
problem.

I hope that this patch adds this new behavoiur without removing current naked. 
Because I need "naked" as it is now also.

Thanks!

avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org