[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Urgent Queries about AVR-GCC
From: |
Larry Barello |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Urgent Queries about AVR-GCC |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:58:28 -0700 |
Last time I checked (about 1-1/2 years ago) IAR slightly edged out GCC in code
generation, but when linked with libraries GCC still won. None of the other AVR
compilers I checked (ICC and CV) came even close.
I guess you *can* have your cake and eat it for free... as long as you program
in
"small" model, which is what GCC does. Still, I agree the switch statement
could be
cleaned up.
Cheers!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Johnson" <address@hidden>
...
>
> Still, at the end of the day GCC is free, generates code which works, and
> is free. I don't think _anyone_ has the right to complain if the code is
> not as good as commercial compilers. As they say, "you gets what you pay
> for".
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Urgent Queries about AVR-GCC, E. Weddington, 2003/06/03