[avr-gcc-list] [VOTE] objdump patch

[Svein E. Seldal]

Hi

It seems like there are several preferences on how the new objdump with 
symbols output should look like.

To make a decision more fair (and to do a little experiment), I will now 
arrange a vote on the syntax of the objdump patch. Here are the choices:


A) The old format (as it is today):

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    .+4         ; 0x212


B) New syntax which is easier and faster to read

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>     ; .+4


C) Similar to B) only without excessive comment. My vote.

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>


D) Similar to the old format. The symbol is located in the comment

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    .+4    ; 0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>


I will keep the vote open out september. In fear of being accused of 
cheating, I will only count the votes that have been sent to the avr-gcc 
list.

I hope I'm not violating any mailing-list rules. If I am, please forgive 
me for being naive/uninformed and please tell me ASAP.


Regards,
Svein