Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750

[Björn Haase]

Bernard Foche wrote:
>
> Now why not have an alloca(3) in libc? Sure it is not the best way to
> manage dynamic memory but vfprintf/scanf are typicall applications where it
> is acceptable. And a functionning alloca() is always handy.
We *are* already having a working alloca. It's within gcc. Only thing that you 
need is an appropriate function declaration.

Bjoern.