Re: [avr-gcc-list] testsuite saga continues

[Paulo Marques]

Hi, all

Wouter van Gulik wrote:
> > The exit through the "exit port" already shows the address. Its only 
> > the exit through "rjmp +0" that doesn't. I'll change that to make it 
> > consistent.
>
> On exit you print CPU_C while in log you print CPU_C * 2. That's the 
> difference, and CPU_C is not so useful. Having the "true" address makes 
> referencing back into a .lss file easier.

Just a little note to let you know that the above change and other small 
cleanups have been committed to cvs.

From the changelog:

- give more information at program exit
- cleanup a lot of #ifdef's
- change the timeout from cycles to instructions, because the simulator 
runs slightly faster this way
- add a barrier for the stack at 0x60, that makes avrtest abort with 
stack overflow when crossed

The next step will definitely be ELF loading support. With ELF loading, 
I can decode symbols like "__bss_end" to know where the stack overflows 
exactly or use "__stack" to know where the stack underflows. I can also 
do a more symbolic log, by decoding addresses to their symbol names.

--
Paulo Marques
Software Development Department - Grupo PIE, S.A.
Phone: +351 252 290600, Fax: +351 252 290601
Web: www.grupopie.com

"Deleted code is debugged code."
Jeff Sickel