RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Warning messages

[Ron Kreymborg]

> Would it be possible to combine the "asm" (or what it does) into
> a new attribute for signal. And then if this option is used, pull 
> the now superfluous mangled class interrupt name from the 
> compiler's name table?

At the very least the new attribute could signal the __vector checking code
Joerg listed earlier that this person is not using normal interrupt handling
and therefore the "misspelled" message is probably inappropriate.

Ron