RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug

[Colin O'Flynn]

Was it the thread referenced on the previous discussion on this?

That was in 2008:
http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg05295.html

Which references: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/26/197

Regards,

  -Colin

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Paulo Marques
Sent: June 9, 2010 3:03 PM
To: Dale
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug

Dale wrote:
> Hi Paulo
>@2010.06.09_15:29:48_+0200

Hi, Dale

>> Dale wrote:
>>[...]
>> Sometimes this doesn't work correctly, but I wasn't able to produce a
>> simple case to show this problem (only very complex programs which I
>> didn't want to post online). :(
> 
> Likewise, which is why I ended up with a crippled sample :-) The concept
> is the same.
> 
> But you agree that there's stack used and never returned for reuse?

Yes, but in the example shown there is no opportunity for reuse, so we
can not know if the compiler would in fact reuse the space or not.

My point is that, in the example, if the compiler actually wrote code to
decrease the stack it would made the code worse, because it would be
doing operations on the stack pointer for nothing.

The problem is that people running gcc on "big" machines never notice
this. The other crowd that noticed it already was the linux kernel
people were the stack is limited to 4Kb. I'm trying to find a similar
thread that I remember reading on LKML, but my google-fu is letting me
down :(

-- 
Paulo Marques
Software Development Department - Grupo PIE, S.A.
Phone: +351 252 290600, Fax: +351 252 290601
Web: www.grupopie.com

"If cats were horses, we could ride up the trees."

_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list