[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] I fixed dtostre()
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] I fixed dtostre() |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:53:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
As E. Weddington wrote:
> Good idea. I was just looking up how IAR does it for their toolset.
> They have 3 versions of (s)printf according to their docs:
> 1. Full-blown version.
> 2. Medium version: no floating point. %f, %g, %G, %e, %E specifiers
> produce errors.
> 3. Small version: same as medium except supports only the %%, %d, %o,
> %c, %s and %x specifiers for int objects, and does not support "field
> width" and "precision" arguments.
I wonder how much difference in code size the last two options would
cause?
> IAR uses linker switches to switch between versions.
Do people feel using linker switches would be more practical than
selecting using a #define?
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- [avr-libc-dev] I fixed dtostre(), Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] I fixed dtostre(), Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/09
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] I fixed dtostre(), Jamie Morken, 2002/09/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] I fixed dtostre(), Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/10
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, ken restivo, 2002/09/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, E. Weddington, 2002/09/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/11
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, Jörgen, 2002/09/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/09/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: printf in avr-libc, Jörgen, 2002/09/12