[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>? |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Oct 2002 10:57:56 -0600 |
On 7 Oct 2002 at 9:41, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
>
>
>
> I think you might be mis-interpreting what I did.
You're *absolutely* right. :-)
(Thanks for the link, I was having a difficult time trying to find
the reference.)
>
> At the end of avr/io.h is this:
>
> #elif defined (__AVR_ATtiny11__)
> # include <avr/iotn11.h>
> #else
> # warning "device type not defined"
> /* # include <avr/io8515.h> */
> #endif
>
> Which might be close, but not quite, what you're thinking.
Spot on. So... it's a warning not an error. But you'd have to take
into account the above when including <io.h> without a defined device
type.
Thanks
Eric
- [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, E. Weddington, 2002/10/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, E. Weddington, 2002/10/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/08
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, E. Weddington, 2002/10/08
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2002/10/08
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/08