|
From: | Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: | Re: [avr-libc-dev] dox status and next release |
Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:15:18 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
As Theodore A. Roth wrote: > :) What about my recently posted patch that moves _LPM & Co out of > :) <avr/ina90.h>? Should i commit that? > > I don't see anything wrong with this: > > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/pipermail/avr-libc-dev/2002-October/000360.html > > Feel free to commit it. The only open topic was whether it's OK to have no _LPM() (but only __LPM()) in the default header, i. e. to require users who want the IAR compatibility names to include <avr/ina90.h>. -- J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |