[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11505] inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_

From: Mudiaga Obada
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11505] inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_defs.h outdated
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:19:40 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041122

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: AVR C Runtime Library.

[bugs #11505] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11505>
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: Mudiaga Obada
On: Mit 05.01.2005 at 21:41

Category:  Documentation
Severity:  5 - Average
Priority:  5 - Normal
Item Group:  None
Resolution:  None
Privacy:  Public
Percent Complete:  0%
Assigned to:  None
Originator Email:  address@hidden
Status:  Open

Summary:  inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_defs.h outdated

Original Submission:  It seems like the documentation in 
./include/avr/sfr_defs.h was left in there after inX()/outX() support was 

The following should be removed:

   The old inp()/outp() macros are still supported, but not recommended to use
   in new code.  The order of outp() arguments is confusing. </quote>

Also the lines

        out     _SFR_IO_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
        sts     _SFR_MEM_ADDR(SPMCR), r24

look stray, since i can't tell from their (stand alone) context what they are 
there for. Also, the comments that follow it looks strage to me...

For my oppinion (which i know comes rather late), no longer having inX()/outX() 
and cbi()/sbi() support is unfortunate. There's lot of existing code that uses 
it, and it can be really inconvinient - especially for those new to 

For detailed info, follow this link:

  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]