[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library

**From**: |
Colin O'Flynn |

**Subject**: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library |

**Date**: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:10:43 -0400 |

**User-agent**: |
KMail/1.7.1 |

Hi,
>* It depends how exactly you want to compare against zero - perhaps*
>* check for denormal (test hidden bit with sbrc/sbrs) is sufficient?*
>* Division by denormal can overflow too, just like division by zero.*
What is the support of denormals in avr-libc's FP routines? Are they
[supposed] to be fully supported? If not than the hidden bit test would
probably not create any problems, and wouldn't chew up much more space/speed.
Regards,
-Colin

**[avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Marek Michalkiewicz*, `2005/01/08`
*Message not available*
*Message not available*
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Marek Michalkiewicz*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**,
*Colin O'Flynn* **<=**
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Paul Schlie*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Paul Schlie*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Bob Paddock*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Paul Schlie*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Joerg Wunsch*, `2005/01/09`